Monday, October 16, 2006

McGuire to Cash Big Severance Check

Title: McGuire to Cash Big Severance Check
Source: AP
Date: October 16, 2006

From the article:
    UnitedHealth Group Inc. will pay its departing chief $5.1 million a year for the rest of his life and a $6.5 million lump sum...
Why? because "company-sponsored investigation determined that many of the company's stock options were backdated to make them more favorable for the recipients, including McGuire, other executives, and thousands of UnitedHealth employees."

So, you do something wrong, you get paid for life.


At 5:16 PM, Blogger Joe said...


McGuire ACT:



A. If I, if I … I … keep that money ….
To: Department of Interior “Ministers” Kempthorne, the Cabinet, Kashari
Date: April 12, 2007
Re: Off The Book Paybacks & Laundering IT Qui Tam Tex Ops (IRS –2)
This qui tam submission applies to the small to jumbo, in sync, acts by the bosses to, by contract, artificially inflate invoice& their by revenue reports, e.g. Below are some highlights, in draft (e) format, using verbatim, under oath quotes, to illustrate:
A. If I, if I … I … keep that money ….

Slotting is synonym for “concessions,” like this:
Q. What is the largest amount of one you can recall?
A. [I]n excess of $24,000,000 (from Hallmark).
Q. So … the [invoice] price … went up when you had slotting?
A. Absolutely.
Doing that was expressly waxed over 70 years ago in Sugar v. U.S., 297 U.S. 553, 573-74 (1936), brought back by Senior Bush in his 12 year VP-P reign.

Q. Monthly payments that are listed?
A. Right.

Q. Cash discounts, right?
A. Yes.

Q. And the … cash amounts, … were these negotiated?
A. Yes, sir.

The teaching is grounded in an unbroken line of decisions.
“It is not for the courts to determine whether in particular settings price-fixing serves an honorable or worthy end!”

The Russell Trust rig practice engaged in concert by all publicly traded companies, but not employed by those privately held like Boney’s & Food-4-Less prior Ralphs (Kroger) acquisition, has a whole lot of names, but will generally be referred to as slotting.


Slotting is when a seller & buyer agree to two prices for one transaction: an inflated invoice price & a real price. The inflated invoice price, not the real price, is made public, reported, e.g., in S.E.C. filings, IRS back-ups, & to other, public ops & used as an up-rigged price point for sales to other, smaller firms, like Stater Bros. [IT] “is itself illegal, no matter what end it was designed to serve.

The numbers involved are huge, apply per item bought, in blocks, for a guaranteed future period, like a 1, 2, or 3 year exclusive buying deal:

Q. [W]ithout giving specifics of any of these other contracts, what types...of commodities or products have been involved?
A. Greeting cards, light bulbs, pasta, dry beans, rice, private label products, numerous...items across the store.

Q. And again, what … kinds of supplies have been involved in those situations?
A. Generally … the major accounts, because they wanted to be sure they were making an impression on senior management….


Designing to lift small ticket retails from under the .99 cent 100 plus percent, e.g., in concert, wasn’t the only thing Bush & Reagan merger maniacs did in the 1980’s. For now, never mind, that THEY DROVE UP massive under & un-employment rates, sickly. And for now, never mind they drove under relative pay scales, grotesquely, inflation & interest accounted. Right NOW, the ON ALL FOURS point is dirty SUGAR laundering.
A key Executive decision maker G, B, e.g., admitted:

A. So by taking those [off invoice boot (e)] monies and setting them aside in a fund ….

A. That's how the rebate program got started and continued.

They admit they don’t report IT, they admit they embezzle IT – the main actor, Mr. Studder confessed:

A. If I, if I … I … keep that money ….
The criminal TRUST, defined as:
A) Acts by two or more people [In house tops & counsel - J. Gray];

Talking, then Acting, e.g., about accounts, off invoice pay backs, paying IT, receiving IT & keeping IT?
B) By agreeing to pool … any interests that they may have connected with … any … commodity [money-stock], that its price [revenues] might in any manner be affected.

Defined here, "person" shall include, but not be limited to, individuals….
What isn’t paid in hard cash or some other money rub form, like vacations, dinners, flights, wining & dining & Mustang Ranch, e.g., is all tracked by supplier canceled checks:

Q. How did you get paid those rebates?
A. In the form of a check.

Suppliers are qui tam keys – the real ranchers, like Rick & Dale Long (Embly Ranch) do not like IT at all. They are bullied into IT.

Bush & Reagan’s drove the 1980’s massive merger mania, locking up mammoth buying power & DIRT (E) CHEAP wholesale prices, driving under loads of small operations. To launder even more bank, they designed a felony SUGAR ring:


A. So by taking those monies and setting them aside in a fund ….

A. That's how the rebate program got started and continued.

A. And now I have … rebates and … could do something really exciting.

A. … we would put that money up in a holding account with our accounting department ….

A. If I, if I had … good numbers … I … keep that money ….

A. We made our sales and profit margins most of the [20 years] … I was there.

A. Maybe one or two times we didn't make it.


About the one or two times in twenty years that they didn’t hit or eclipse their joint revenue projections, they falsely report that they did, by dipping into the shush slush fun money:
A. … we would put [some of] that money up in a holding account with our accounting department ….

A. … and they would hold it to … when we [might] … put it [to make] … our [reported] gross margins ….

A. … to smooth out our gross so that we were on a consistent basis ….

A. … so on a quarterly basis we were [always] able to achieve our target [10Q reports, aka,] margins.

BUSHS’ 1980’S 10Q

A. We made our sales and profit margins most of the [20 years] … I was there.

A. Maybe one or two times we didn't make it.

A. And now I have … rebates and … could do something really exciting.

Q. When you say "something real exciting," what kind of things are you referring to?
A. We could run extremely hot e—ads….

A. The next month … more rebates come in.

Q. Over what period of time did you … use … those funds?
A. -- it would kind of depend on my numbers that period.

A. If I, if I had … good numbers … I could afford to keep that money ….

A. … I would … hold [IT] ….


A. … I would say, "Okay. Next month I have some money … " because I didn't have to use it.

A. The next month … more rebates come in.

And this lie is a real gem – use Sugar money to run ads they run anyway – WOW (e):

A. We [it is] … extremely hot e— ….

They do the same thing with advertising contracts:
A. Over the 15 years that I was, you know 20 years there ….

A. It was a process you did almost on a daily basis. You were always looking for opportunities to improve your [slush (e)] profits, your gross margins.

A. But I couldn't be specific as to how many times we did it. But it certainly wasn't just e--- that we were looking at pricing and looking at the margins and trying to justify why they were low.

The entire executive lobby for preferences from executive empires is patent. Take Mr. Tex’s Lea Weingarten – the wealthy heiress of the Weingarten supermarket chain in Texas.


Both worked as finance executives for Enron, the energy-trading titan that crumbled in late 2001 in one of the largest accounting scandals in history.

IT is a small to jumbo Roger Data grand slam action, tax evasion too – that is anyone’s private attorney general STANDING trigger:

This rule outlining A.G. Gonzales’ Duty is instructive:


[I]t shall be the duty of the several … States attorneys, … under the direction of the Attorney General, to institute proceedings in equity to prevent … violations.

And this over looked rule is one ticket anyone may employ to cure IT, civilly:

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Common Sense – 1776 Thomas Paine (1737–1809)

Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to misbehavior by city government, which we might expect in a country without government, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built on the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform, and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him out of two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others.


25% T-RIG GIGS times 5 plus is the offer on the table now.

I swear under penalty of perjury, on my father & mothers’ graves, on the white cross, on my constitution, all stated herein are true based on my first hand recon & red flag information.
Speech does not lose its protected character … simply because it may embarrass others or coerce them into action.

Executed on: _________________
(Sig – 4-me &)

1st - Our Birth C.D.s’ Please
But the price of a commodity, and therefore also of labour, is equal to its cost of production.

C: Round 35 drop – to a host of class action attorneys & press

At 5:22 PM, Blogger Joe said...

This Is My Practice - “ALL” (JD-X%)

To: A. Greenspan, J. Snow, TB, B. Bernanke & Roberts
Date: March 13, 2007
Re: Your private Prime Rate rigs & Mortgage Rate Rival Rigs

You cartel misters gage all your prices based on our ability to pay, while remaining, on average, 9K in debt to your VISA et al partners. So really, IT is based on our inability to pay, or ability to stay under, way under. This confession, by one of your chain boys, is instructive:
A. [I]t is a very delicate balance between -our sales volume and -our pricing structure.

A. And if [we] … raise -our price, [we] … lose a certain amount of sales.

A. And if [we] … raise -our price too much, … [we] … lose sales, [and] … end up with less profit.

Under what clause (not toilet paper law your boys like Orin Hatch, rammed through my house) do your boys, Greenspan Bernanke, e.g., divine the legitimate power to rig the price of loaning us our own money, for your IMF amigos & banker buds’ stock rigs. The limited power WE CONTRACTED to you is spelled out real clearly my friends: to “regulate commerce” not do commerce to keep us in the hole so you can live large gluttony lives – one of the 7 sevens sins, remember.


“Whereas a monopoly is the control of a market by one seller….


You boys know the simple rules require that:

A. [Prime rate] … prices [may] not [be] dependent upon anything but the forces of [direct cost variables in] supply [ing] … demand.

A. “[T]he mature [like Big Ben Bernanke to] measure individual [direct loan] item costs and price accordingly.”

A. “Profits are supra-competitive when they are unrestrained by [direct cost price] competition.”

I call that three way tri-tip bits “STAR STATUTES,” & you know the rule:

“When a statute is clear on its face it is both unnecessary and improper to engage in the murky interpretation process.”

It would be a wish come true IF I get the chance to meet the mortal who dares to dissect that rule, like Bush’s Bones & Numb Skull judges, Alito & Robertson, who do IT every day, by entertaining contaminated 10(b-5) people stock actions.

If I do get to demolition deposition you, the undeniable answer in response to the my question – do you gage prices based on supplying demand at cost, aka, price right protocol? Is that you will answer:

A. No, I never considered [the direct cost of] supply and demand as a factor” in … [prime rate] price….

You see, unlike all the other players in the field, I shall stick to definitions, going into the game. I shall define everything germane in the complaint & every step of the way, & you will simply not be able to worm your way around IT – well, at least not without me banging you on IT every chance I get, in the media too. And not without exposing yourself & your hitter esquires, like Mark Spooner, to overt perjury plus.
Exactly the same rules apply to every quarter of the business you engage - all bank executives with whom you rig mortgage prices, in concert:

“[A]n oligopoly is the … condition that results when there are but a few sellers [of credit - bills of credit].”


I understand that you & the entire class elephant bar, like Michael Hausefeld, are highly challenged when it comes to vertical rigs, but this shit I find boring. One void vertical contract is between your fiduciary, Ben Bernanke & all banking executives to re-loan us our own money, at double jacked up prices (rates). You chose to take on a flat felony contract duty to both sets of your stocker holders to:
A. [N]ever consider-- [the direct cost of] supply & demand as a factor” in … [mortgage rate] price….

You all know the global rule is revenue equals overhead, meaning a dead net zero to free load off of:
“Profits are supra-competitive when they are unrestrained by [direct cost price] competition.”


So you know, IT is too easy to do you head on, so I use angles. First, lets define some real simple synonyms for the criminal act of “matching” or pricing within a “narrow ambit” of a rivals’ rates (prices): “follow,” “copy,” price “at,” “close to,” and so forth.

In lieu of legal rate price protocol, measuring all direct overhead in serving us, dividing & setting a single rate accordingly, you sponsor the above felony act of rival based rate price rigging. Here is a short clip of the admission, which is globally applicable:

A. In Europe, this has gone on for a long time, when the central bank in Germany changes what they call the … rate or the interest rate, Denmark always follows.

A. The Danish central bank just copies that move. They are very open about that. Everybody knows … in the … banking community.

A. If they think the international financial market will sustain an increase … in the … rate, we are just going to copy them."

Those words came right of your boys mouth - Dr. Ken Elzinga, when he was on trial stand in 1999. You must know Kenny, he has done a whole lot of XXX work for your Trust division. No one has a better CV than Kenny.


It is elementary common law, codified in Cal RIP-KEN code 16722, rendering all contracts that “Affect” direct cost “prices:


That means illegal to even try to collect, in & out of court. Every letter you (agency) put in the mail exposes you to 10,000 & 10 years in prison – remember HOW WE got Al Capone. Of course you can’t pretend to have a legislative or judicially witch crafted exemption – no preference of commerce. And you super sophisticated guys on constructive – and actual -notice of knowing ALL of it, because your boy, Bernanke, majored in correct rate price protocol & taught IT, like lots of others on Bush’s team.

Would you like to challenge me on the fact that required teaching is required behavior for a reason? Elective bush, like marketing, in upper grad programs, is a choice, used to nail clip faith in contracts. Being tricky isn’t cute business acumen.


If there wasn’t an identifiable double set of contracts involved, the only possible excuse for it would be the Cal–Ripken section 16725 is, in fact, the “I DID IT RIGHT” test, called the rule of reason. In a nut, it goes like this – Bankers & Bernanke shoulder the flat burden to prove, out of the box, that:

A) You employed correct price protocol; or
B) Not doing IT insured a dead net zero for stock porfolios.

The only conceivable shot you have at not doing “IT” to the “T” is proving that you sought, obtained & used rival data to align with & insure the unshakable rule of rate gravity competition (kinked demand curve). That gives some teeth to this gibberish commentary about your burden of proof, owed on request, by contract, even before getting to court dip shits:

A) Designed to promote [cost] competition; &
B) Actually does promote [cost] competition.

That attack demolishes every single bank merger your team has anointed over say the past 30 years, in which you assured we the people that IT would result in the lowest possible at cost rate prices, as promised by the word “competition” used in all the papers. Yea, you are pretty fucked on that one too.
You can’t do IT, not owing your duty to dice it – for lazy holders of other people’s labor-stock, like Senator Trent Lott & the Duke!


And what about this double ending “point” shit. It is metaphysically impossible to employ correct rate price protocol, which orders you to roll up all costs in one price, collection included, two or more times. That hustle of yours I have termed felony “splitting.” I don’t think it’s in the books yet, but IT will be. I have already introduced that language to a host of academic contacts in the field, across the nation, like Econometric Doctors Roger Noll, Christy & Shultz.


Never mind your felony compounding of interest, whereby you little nibblers turn an unfaithful math trick every chance you get. Do you get your rocks off sucking little bites daily, from swarms of us, which adds up to huge, huge qui tam mandatory exposure? We’ll follow up on that later. For now, the real egg beater is the fact that you & your boss, brilliant Bush, refuse to honor your book keeping duty post all the ins & all the outs of every penny that you charge us for loaning us our own cash – Cy Pres rules:

A) No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and
B) A regular Statement and Account of the Receipts &
C) Expenditures of all public Money – web published.

Shit howdy TEX, Martha Stewart got 6 months for obstructing justice!


Now I understand that it is you boys who have the single largest stake in artificially inflating real estate prices, ongoing, by fluid sought, obtained & use of other prices as a benchmark for rigging prices, in lieu of correct price protocol. The higher home prices means a lot more forbidden “bill of credit” interest you statesmen get to free ride to financial obesity on. The way you have tweaked the rules concerning “supply & demand” is transparent – IT doesn’t cost you shit, yet you keep tweaking fixed and variable rates, in concert, to find the optimal cartel sweet spot. That isn’t cute, not one bit.

Again, this blip confession applies roundly to all your retail Century 21 chain service ops:
This confession, by one of your chain boys, is instructive:
A. [I]t is a very delicate balance between -our sales volume and -our pricing structure.


This supreme commentary on the entire set of natural price structures equals cost and revenue equals direct cost of serving others structure is instructive:
The elimination of such [cost based pricing] conditions was [& is] sought primarily for its effect on the [anti-cost] price structures.


Kelly Blue book like rules control, prices drop, unless you are dealing with a really juiced up roof – shall we tango on that one, in court, on behalf of my parents estate, on Roskilde & Terrace Court in Buelton, Ca.?
By full court molestation of the rules that govern the civilized, you have created a psychology in the great masses of what I call make a quick buck IRA syndrome – to re-coup some of what you have stolen, under color of authority, for your private ops: stress, depression, domestic violence & relatively petty crime are direct results of your contract sickness.


Let me remind you of the rules concerning you – IT is just law stuff:

ICE-Article 3 - Section 2. In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.

Section 3. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act [bills], or on confession in open court.


This is my counter offer to your ignoring my past way underbid offers: 110 = 800’S for each in my corner, to the 4nd % of the family & friend tree! And I think Snow & Bernanke should retire, what do you think? I hope you don’t mind my colorful use of the “WE” language – it aids focus.
I want you know that I still love you all - this is called TUFF LOVE, speech, a little hard core, yes, but just advocacy – that is what I do, & IT is going to cost you a whole lot more IF you continue ignoring IT.

"[Speech & word art] … is a weapon of attack, of scorn and ridicule and satire; it is least effective when it tries to pat some politician on the back. It is usually as welcome as a bee sting and is always controversial in some quarters." Long, The Political Cartoon: Journalism's Strongest Weapon, The Quill 56, 57 (Nov. 1962).

The rule is I may press every advantage in my representation, O.K.!

Executed: _________________ ________________________

C: D file – Hale Zar Bush Snow Ball - Round 9

See McCampbell v. Ralphs Trial transcripts, on disk, San Diego Sup Ct. Case No 703666 for in & out facts about HOW ALL CHAINS SET THEIR PRICES, IN CONCERT


Post a Comment

<< Home